|
Allied to the problem
At the end of a French delegation’s visit to
Pakistan recently, the Pakistan Foreign Office put out its usual
statement. It referred to Pakistan as an anchor of peace in the region
and said that the leader of the French delegation, former Premier
Senator (Francois) Poncet, had commended Pakistan’s role in promoting
peace and stability. One does not know if this is a reflection of Gaul
indulgence, Pakistan’s continued self-delusion or simply a Foreign
Office sleight of hand. One thing it definitely is, is being elastic
with the truth.
Soon after this, US State Department Assistant
Secretary Richard Boucher, on a visit to Pakistan, commended America’s
stalwart ally for arresting the maximum number of terrorists. But where
else would you find the largest number of terrorists anyway? It is like
showing surprise at finding kangaroos in Australia.
Since September 11, 2001, General Musharraf’s
policy of riding two horses simultaneously — the one for war on terror
and the other for supporting jehad — has needed extraordinary equestrian
skills. One of the horses is likely to gallop away soon. There are signs
of impatience and doubt in the West. Think-tanks like the Carnegie
Endowment for Peace have begun to doubt Musharraf’s sincerity and feel
that he is exploiting the war on terror for himself. It is not yet known
whether the US has realised that Pakistan is part of the problem and not
part of the solution. The more optimistic assumption is that there is
realisation, but also helplessness, at the moment.
In today’s Pakistan, there are three main harsh
realities. First, that the Baloch struggle is not about the three main
tribes, the Bugtis, Marris and the Mengals, fighting for the
preservation of their Sardari system. The struggle is about basic rights
— economic and political — because the revolt is all over Balochistan
and not restricted to these three tribal areas. The second reality is
that the Waziristan area in the Fata belt, which was the launching pad
for many of the campaigns in the jehad against the Soviets in
Afghanistan, is today prime Taliban country — and only growing in depth
and area. Third, Pakistan is getting ‘jehadised’, ever so incrementally;
one may not notice it, but it is.
In Balochistan, there were four incidents on a
single day, April 6. Between January and March this year, there were
nearly 60 incidents of rocket attacks all over the province and at least
1,600 rockets were fired. In February, gas pipelines were disrupted 21
times, affecting supplies to the rest of the country. Nawab Akbar Bugti
is a fugitive in his own province and has not returned to Bugti Fort for
months. Akhtar Mengal is constantly harassed and Nawab Khair Bux Marri,
along with his two sons, has been slapped with an arms and ammunition
case. This is despite the fact that these leaders have from time to
time, along with harsh statements, also said that the present struggle
is not yet about secession but about provincial rights.
Reactions from Islamabad have been on expected
lines — use of indiscriminate and excessive force, artillery, helicopter
gun-ships and aircraft included. And finding that an ordinary Baloch was
willing to die for the long-standing grievances of greater autonomy,
prevention of ethnic identity from being swamped by the Punjabi
outsiders, for the removal of military cantonments and a greater share
in revenue and development, Pakistani authorities have begun to blame
external forces. Iranian authorities, fearing that the US would want to
use Balochistan to destabilise their country, may seek to pre-empt that.
Pakistan’s military leaders are unable to admit that the hatred for
Punjabi dominance is widespread and deep-rooted in the other three
provinces. There have been suggestions for the trifurcation of Punjab
around Bahawalpur, Multan and Rawalpindi. Thus, apart from solving
Baloch problems, Punjab needs to be cut to size if Pakistan has to be
saved.
The fear is that attempts to portray the present
struggle as the selfish handiwork of a few misguided miscreants and
attempts to destroy traditional Baloch society by abolishing the Sardari
system without anything else in place, would leave the province in a
vacuum to be filled by the Taliban alumni.
Waziristan, with its inhospitable terrain and
warlike conservative tribes, the Waziris and Mahsuds, was the ideal
launching pad in the jehad against the Soviets in the Paktia and Khost
provinces across the border. Today, terrorists fleeing from Afghanistan
have made south and north Waziristan their new Taliban country, using it
to regroup and relaunch into Afghanistan. About two months ago, Tolo TV
channel, run from Kabul by some liberal Afghans, had shown gruesome
details of half a dozen bodies being dragged by a jeep through the
streets of Mandrakhel. Another scene depicted severed heads and crowds
chanting ‘Long live Osama bin Laden’, ‘Long live Mullah Omar’.
The fear is that the Taliban mindset and influence
have begun to spread to the ‘settled areas’ of the NWFP. Areas like
Darra Adam Khel provide home-made weapons and can turn in upto 400
weapons of varying kinds and calibre in a day. The Taliban are able to
move at ease from Karachi to Darra to Peshawar to Quetta and on to
Kandahar or Helmund or Jalalabad. Gulbuddin Hikmetyar, the ISI’s
blue-eyed boy and now at peace with the Taliban, is back in business.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai has more than once
complained to Musharraf about Taliban’s transgressions, but Pakistan’s
leaders continue to chase the dream of strategic depth in Afghanistan
and are blinded to the fact that this is becoming their nightmare.
Pushed to the wall, Pakhtoons of Afghanistan will claim that the Durand
Line runs south from Attock along the Indus up to Dera Ismail Khan,
while the Pakistanis would want to push this up to Kabul. Therein lie
the seeds of future conflict.
Over the years, conventional wisdom has held that
the NWFP and Balochistan were the more conservative societies and,
therefore, more susceptible to religious fundamentalism, Punjab was the
symbol of modernism. This is partially true and partially a myth
perpetuated by the Punjabis. Both the Lashkar-e-Tayyeba and the rabid
Sunni organisation, the Sipaha-e-Sahaba, have their birthplaces here.
The largest number of blasphemy cases were reported from Punjab last
year. Musharraf could not go to Lahore in March for the Basant
celebrations because the mullahs declared the festival un-Islamic for
its Hindu origins. Everyone blames the curriculum of the madrasas as
being responsible for churning out jehadis in Pakistan. Yet mainstream
schools continue to teach jehad to their students. Attacks on Christians
and Ahmediyas have increased.
Waziristan is slipping out of control and of the
80,000 troops deployed earlier to control the situation, some have been
diverted to Balochistan. US hi-tech surveillance systems and border
teams helping in joint operations along the Afghan-Pakistan border, have
been unable to pick up any important al-Qaeda operatives, but the locals
move across freely. More troops are needed.
The Pakistani excuse to the Americans is that it
cannot divert more troops from the eastern border given the situation
with India. The only way this can be done is if Indo-Pak problems from
Siachen to Sir Creek are solved, enabling Pakistan to disengage and
re-deploy. In the interim, if the US could at least nudge the Indians to
at least demilitarise Siachen and Kashmir, it could help in the war on
terror.
Hindustantimes.com Vikram Sood April 11, 2006 |