|
FRESH AIR STRIKES IN
BALOCHISTAN
by B. Raman
Even six months after
President General Pervez Musharraf ordered his Army and the Air Force to
suppress the freedom struggle launched by the Baloch nationalist elements,
the freedom struggle continues to gather strength with no sign of any
impact on the freedom-fighters despite the large-scale use of heavy
weapons and air strikes. Their motivation and determination to achieve
independence remain as strong as ever. There has been a steady flow of
volunteers to the Balochistan Liberation Army
(BLA) and other groups carrying on the freedom struggle and the military
operations have not been able to disrupt the training of the new
volunteers by these organisations in the liberated pockets set up by them.
The ban imposed by the
Army on the BLA has had no effect on it. On the contrary, it has only
further increased its popularity among the Baloch people and demonstrated
the ineffectiveness of the army and its inability to have the ban
enforced. The freedom-fighters have not been short of funds and weapons.
While the funds have been coming from the Baloch diaspora abroad, the arms
and ammunition have been seized by the freedom-fighters from the stocks of
the security forces during raids on their posts.
In the face of
international concern over the large number of civilian casualties due to
the military operations, the Pakistani military had suspended the use of
Air Force planes and helicopter gunships for a while. Helicopters were
used only for logistics purposes and not for strikes directed against the
freedom-fighters. But for the last few days, the use of air strikes has
been resumed and over eight helicopter gunships have been going into
action against the freedom-fighters resulting in many casualties. Air
strikes have been directed against not only the armed freedom-fighters,
but also against villagers suspected of assisting them. While the air
strikes have been taking place in many parts of the province, they have
been particularly concentrated in the areas inhabited by the Bugti, Marri
and Mengal tribes. The freedom-fighters have claimed to have shot down two
helicopters, but the shooting down of only one has so far been confirmed.
There has been no change
in the modus operandi of the freedom-fighters. It continues to consist of
attacks on the posts of the security forces, ambushes of military convoys,
attacks on gas pipelines and railway lines. They have taken care to ensure
that their operations do not cause civilian casualties. The
freedom-fighters have denied responsibility for an explosion with an
improvised explosive device outside a roadside tea stall near Quetta on
June 12, 2006, in which five bystanders were killed and 17 others injured.
They have accused the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) of having
organised this explosion with the help of people brought from outside the
province in order to discredit the freedom struggle.
The Army had moved in a
large number of Balochs living in Punjab and Sindh into the province and
distributed to them the land vacated by the members of the Bugti tribe who
had run away from their places of residence due to suppression by the
Army. The Army was hoping that these re-settled Balochs would help it in
fighting against the freedom-fighters. Its hopes have been belied. Many of
the re-settled Balochs, who faced the hostility of the local population,
have run away to where they were brought from.
The anti-Chinese anger
amongst the Balochs continues to be as strong as ever, but the moves for a
joint freedom struggle by the Balochs, the Shias of Gilgit and Baltistan
and the Uighurs of Xinjiang have not made much headway so far, but the
contacts are continuing. There are two groups of Uighur militants. One
group, like the Balochs, is fighting for independence for the Uighur
homeland. It is not pan-Islamic and does not accept the ideology of Al
Qaeda. Another group is pan-Islamic and has accepted the leadership of Al
Qaeda in the International Islamic Front (IIF). The move is for
co-operation between the Balochs and those Uighurs, who are fighting for
independence for their homeland, but do not accept the pan-Islamic
ideology of Al Qaeda.
Faced with increasing
threats to their existing projects in Balochistan such as the ones for the
construction of the Gwadar port and the development of the copper mines,
the Chinese are reported to have expressed their inability to help
Pakistan in the construction of a nuclear power station in Balochistan.
During his present visit to China to attend the summit of the Shanghai
Co-operation Organisation, Gen. Musharraf is expected to discuss with the
Chinese a Pakistani request for a Chinese-aided 600 MW nuclear power
station at Karachi.
The Chinese continue to
evince interest in the construction of a pipeline from Gwadar to Xinjiang,
a road linking Gwadar with the Karakoram Highway and a huge oil refinery
complex at Gwadar, which would partly meet the requirements of Pakistan
and Xinjiang. A proposal for the emergency evacuation of the Chinese
personnel working in Balochistan by sea should the situation in the
province deteriorate seriously is also under discussion between the two
countries. Though Gen. Musharraf has assured the Chinese that such a
situation is unlikely to arise, the Chinese reportedly do not want to take
risk and want to keep a drill for emergency evacuation ready.
The proposal is that
Pakistani helicopters and ships would be used for the evacuation, if it
becomes necessary. There is at present no proposal to station Chinese
helicopters and ships for that purpose. A team of Chinese naval and
intelligence officers is reported to have visited Islamabad, Karachi and
Balochistan for discussions in this regard.
It has been reported that
the Baloch freedom-fighters are disappointed that after its initial
expression of concern over the military operations against the
freedom-fighters, the Government of India has not come out with any other
statement on the continuing suppression of the Balochs by the Pakistani
military establishment. The freedom-fighters have been closely following
the reports of the discussions involving India, Pakistan and Iran on the
construction of an Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline. They are determined
not to allow this pipeline or any pipeline from Turkmenistan to pass
through their territory unless they are also involved in the talks on the
subject and part of the transit fee is paid to them. Similarly, they are
determined to oppose any pipeline to Xinjiang. The Government of India
should at least have discussions with the overseas representatives of the
Baloch freedom-fighters on this subject in order to find out their
thinking.
The situation in
Balochistan and the progress of the freedom struggle are attracting
increasing attention abroad. It is learnt there were recently discussions
on the subject at the International Institute For Strategic Studies
(IISS), London, and the Congressionally-funded US Institute of Peace in
Washington DC. Delhi-based think-tanks should invite the overseas Baloch
leaders in order to educate Indian public opinion on the on-going freedom
struggle in Balochistan. India should not hesitate to extend its
political, diplomatic and moral support to the Baloch freedom-fighters.
17.6.06
(The writer is
Additional Secretary (retd.), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New
Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai.
E-mail:
itschen36@gmail.com |