Balochistan’s problem cannot be resolved by banning BLA

EDITORIAL:

A Federal Ministry of Interior notification issued on Sunday in exercise of its powers under Section 11(b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997 has banned the Baloch Liberation Army, a group that has claimed responsibility for various acts of sabotage in Balochistan, and declared it a terrorist outfit. The notification, reports say, has been referred to the provincial government in order for it to take action against the BLA on its basis. Earlier, in a move towards this decision, the government cancelled arms licences issued to some Baloch nationalist leaders. Justifying the move, the interior ministry said it has evidence of the BLA’s involvement in rocket and other armed attacks on national installations, the civilian population and security forces. Meanwhile, in an ironic twist, the Balochistan home minister, Shoeb Nausherwani, says no organisation named the Baloch Liberation Army exists. He said that some four to five thousand people have been using the name of the BLA as “an excuse for anti-state activities” but lack the structure and planning of a proper organisation. “These people are paid Rs 4,000 to Rs 5,000 monthly by local and foreign elements to trouble the administration.” The government also says it will move to oust MPA Balach Marri from the provincial assembly because he is one of the leaders of the BLA.

All this is most intriguing. Why would the government declare the BLA a terrorist organisation? This is what the interior secretary, Syed Kamal Shah, told this newspaper: “Anyone associated with the BLA or supporting its terrorist activities will be tried under the Anti-Terrorist Act.” This is significant and it signals that the government may be planning a crackdown in Balochistan in the near future. Mr Shah says that while no senior BLA leader has been caught as yet, several small-level operatives were in custody and they had confessed to planning and executing acts of sabotage.

The decision also allows the government to seal all BLA offices and freeze its bank accounts. This is again significant considering that the provincial home minister does not even accept that any organisation by this name exists, albeit he has admitted that some four to five thousand people might be creating a law and order situation.

Could it be that these people are actually active supporters of the three sardars who have fallen foul of Islamabad? This is where the issue of the identity of the BLA becomes so important. Does such an organisation really exist? Granted that “BLA spokesmen” have been all too keen to take responsibility for various acts of sabotage; granted also that they send press releases to the media and there have been reports in various newspapers and magazines of armed Baloch posing as BLA members. Yet we do need to know whether this is a real thing with a proper structure, organisation, goals and objectives or whether this shadowy outfit is a ragtag bunch of Baloch nationalists whose sole purpose is to be in the employ of Baloch sardars and trouble the government on their behalf.

A possible giveaway could be the fact that the government can now seal the offices of the BLA and freeze its bank accounts. What does this mean? Surely, the BLA does not operate from known locations; neither is it likely to have bank accounts, or at least accounts that can be discovered. On the other hand, Baloch nationalist parties do have overt locations and known accounts. What if the interior ministry or some intelligence agency should find some dubious “connection” between a known nationalist party and this shadowy BLA? Will it freeze the accounts of the party and seal its offices? Is this a prelude to this sort of a crackdown in the province in the near future?

Possibly. As a matter of fact Mr Shah told the media on Sunday that Balach Marri, the son of Nawab Khair Baksh Marri — one of the rebel sardars — heads the BLA. This means not only that Mr Marri can now be arrested and tried under the ATA in his absence but that he stands to lose his seat in the Balochistan Assembly. The move is, therefore, geared towards putting the squeeze on the sardars who remain recalcitrant and who the government thinks are goading the youth into acts of sabotage and subversion. The BLA comes in handy because it is difficult to crack down on nationalist parties with representation in the legislatures but it is easier to ban them if they are found involved with the “BLA”.

This is not a smart move. It is not backed and supplemented by a political process. The sub-committee headed by Senator Wasim Sajjad has still to finalise and present its report on the power-sharing formula. It is all very good to put down a couple of anti-government sardars and induct other pro-government sardars into the province and do some development work — all in tandem — in order to tame the province. But surely development and participation is not about “taming” any province. It is about participation in and profit from an equitable distribution of the fruits of development. It is about removing the sense of deprivation and inequity that envelops the province. Banning this or that will simply not do. Remember how the NAP was banned by ZA Bhutto on the orders of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the mid-1970s as an “anti-Pakistan” party? Did it stop the same nationalists of the NAP from banding together under the ANP? Didn’t the ANP then go on to win seats in parliament? Indeed, didn’t the subsequent military government of Zia Ul Haq actually give a certificate of patriotism to the ANP and all the jailed nationalist “anti-Pakistan” elements and release them from prison unconditionally and withdraw all the cases against them?

This is a bureaucratic measure that will be used to repress the sentiments of those — misguided or not — who want greater rights for their province. It will not solve anything. A statement by Sheikh Rashid yesterday to the effect that there will be no talks with Sardar Bugti and that the army operation will “sort out” the trouble makers confirms this diagnosis. Dailytimes.com 11.4.06

 
Editorials from Pakistani press: Ban on BLA

The federal government has declared the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) a terrorist organisation and banned it under Section 11(b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997. The charge against the BLA is that it is involved in anti-state activities. Lists of the BLA’s office bearers would now be sent to all police stations for taking action against them, although it is not known if the underground group has ever revealed itself. Similarly, the quest to freeze the BLA’s bank accounts may not prove fruitful, if at all any exist. Balochistan’s IG police has delivered an extraordinary piece of legal advice, asserting that now that the BLA had been officially declared a terrorist organisation, its name could not appear in the media. The IG went on to accuse the MPA from Kahan, Balach Marri, son of the tribe’s chief Khair Baksh Marri, of being the alleged head of the BLA, a charge Balach had denied last month to reporters, although he expressed sympathy with the BLA’s demands for complete control of the Baloch over their natural resources. The IG said Balach would now lose his seat in the provincial assembly. Balach’s elder brother Gazin, who served as the province’s home minister in 1993-96, is said to have been arrested in Dubai, on money laundering charges according to Chaudry Yaqub, but which is still not clear. This, however, is sufficient proof for the IG that the BLA has been receiving funds from abroad, although he did not specify from whom.

Not unexpectedly, Baloch nationalist politicians have reacted negatively to the development, saying it would further alienate the people of the province and create more mistrust and hatred towards the Centre. Already, a strike against the siege of Attaullah Mengal and his son Akhtar Mengal’s houses in Karachi proved all but total throughout the province on Sunday, with the exception of Quetta. According to Balochistan’s home minister, some 4,000 insurgents are pitted against the government’s security forces. Official spokesmen continue to assert that the whole trouble will be put down in a couple of months and the writ of the state established.

It is possible to see where the government is going on the basis of its statements and actions since several rockets were fired near Kohlu during President General Pervez Musharraf’s visit last December. Since then, the province has been wracked by daily acts of sabotage of infrastructure and attacks on the security forces, followed by counter-attacks and operations by the latter. Contrary to the government’s assertions that only two or three districts are troubled because of the instigation of two or three sardars, the fact cannot be denied that the pattern of guerrilla attacks extends through the length and breadth of the province. Far from being able to crush the insurgents in two months, the government is facing an incremental increase in the violence plaguing the province. On these trends at least, the government’s claim sounds more like wishful thinking.

Washington does not seem to agree with Islamabad’s characterisation of the Baloch insurgents as terrorists, if the statement of Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Richard Boucher during his recent visit is anything to go by. Nor can the context of nationalist demands for provincial autonomy and control of the natural resources of the province be ignored when analysing the situation. The government seems blindly to be adhering to the notion that force will ‘sort out’ the problem. Time will tell, but already there are many in the country who do not share the government’s perceptions and warn of bigger troubles to come if a course of political negotiations is not chosen instead of the present aggressiveness. Thepost.com.pk 11.4.06
 
BLA banning

The government's decision to proscribe the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) under the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act will further isolate the Baloch people who have taken up arms to claim what they consider their due share in the country's natural and political resources. The government says its decision is based on evidence that the group has been involved in anti-state activities and targeting state installations and security personnel.

However, the banning of the BLA will only deepen the rift between the state and the Baloch tribesmen, shutting the doors for a negotiated settlement of lingering issues. If it is expected that the BLA's proscription will neutralise its activities, the government is sadly mistaken as similar measures against many extremist groups in the past never dissuaded them from carrying out their agenda. What such steps, however, led to was a complete breakdown of any communication between state agencies and these groups that would have been possible otherwise.

Although acts of violence and terrorism are reprehensible and must be denounced for they cause human misery, they are generally carried out by groups of people who are victims of persistent desolation, despondency and dejection. Such an analogy can be drawn for Balochistan as well -- the country's largest province endowed with precious natural resources but massively under-developed and marred by deep-rooted poverty. The state-sardar administrative convenience has only worked against the interests of the people, many of whom found it expedient to express their voices under the BLA umbrella.

Undoubtedly, the BLA's engagement in terrorism, or so the government says, has only hurt the cause it has been struggling for. At the same time, its banning is perfectly under the available statutes. But this is not the solution. The state should have engaged the BLA and other disgruntled Baloch groups in talks to find a negotiated settlement to the issues. Policy and legal measures that exclude, alienate and isolate never lead to durable solutions. Such steps only take situations to a point of no return.

The state must not repeat the mistakes it made in the seventies when it lost its eastern wing as a result of its flawed policy choices that only hardened the radicals and created a conducive environment for external actors to intervene. Jang.com.pk/thenews 11.4.06
 
Banning BLA

THE increasing incidents of sabotage, attacks on FC posts and personnel and killing of innocent citizens in Balochistan are highly condemnable. In cases responsibility for the acts has been claimed in the name of Balochistan Liberation Army. While on Sunday the Interior Ministry banned the BLA as a terrorist group, there are lot of discrepancies regarding how government circles view the outfit. According to the notification from Islamabad the organization is headed by some tribal leaders. IG Balochistan has been more specific, saying MPA Balach Mari heads the organization. Home Minister Nausherwani on the other hand has expressed doubts about BLA being a centralised organisation. The Interior Secretary has announced that the offices of the BLA will be closed down and its accounts frozen . He has also declared that those associated with it will be tried in Anti-Terrorism Courts. Banning an organization that does not seek the government permission to operate hardly affect its activities. Terrorist outfits do not maintain offices with addresses and telephone numbers duly recorded in telephone directories, nor do they keep bank accounts under their own names. The measures are more likely to be employed, as maintained by Senator Sanaullah, to harass political opponents accused of being “associated” with the outfit. What is being done to Kh Saad Rafique, to quote only one example, underlines that Anti-Terrorism Courts are liable to be misused against government critics. If this happens in Balochistan the situation will worsen rather than improve.

According to Interior Secretary the BLA maintains “frari camps” to train workers to carry out acts of sabotage. This again proves that the use of force is not the best way to deal with the phenomenon. What has happened is that instead of there being reduction in militant activities, acts of sabotage and attacks on security forces have increased manifold while the frari camps continue to operate. Originally confined to Kohlu, Dera Bugti, and Quetta acts of violence are now taking place from one end of Balochistan to another. On Saturday a military convoy was attacked near Wadh, causing injuries to a number of troops including a brigadier. The military operation has been counterproductive. Great Britain which is much more organised and resourceful than Pakistan tried for decades but failed to quell militancy in Ireland through force and after burning its fingers had to resort to political negotiations to settle the dispute. The Tamil insurgency which has gone on for quarter century is yet another proof of the failure of military solutions for complex political issues. There is little likelihood of results being any different in Balochistan.
As President Musharraf has reiterated several times, militancy can be reined in only by addressing its root causes. It was a good idea to set up a Parliamentary Committee to resolve the grievances of Balochistan. Had its recommendations been implemented, the situation would have improved long ago. Before it further deteriorates, the government should open talks with Baloch leaders, all of whom want the resolution of their problems within the context of the federation. Nation.com.pk 11.4.06