|
|
|
Balochistan’s
problem cannot be resolved by banning BLA EDITORIAL:
A Federal Ministry of Interior notification issued on Sunday in
exercise of its powers under Section 11(b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act of
1997 has banned the Baloch Liberation Army, a group that has claimed
responsibility for various acts of sabotage in Balochistan, and declared
it a terrorist outfit. The notification, reports say, has been referred to
the provincial government in order for it to take action against the BLA
on its basis. Earlier, in a move towards this decision, the government
cancelled arms licences issued to some Baloch nationalist leaders.
Justifying the move, the interior ministry said it has evidence of the
BLA’s involvement in rocket and other armed attacks on national
installations, the civilian population and security forces. Meanwhile, in
an ironic twist, the Balochistan home minister, Shoeb Nausherwani, says no
organisation named the Baloch Liberation Army exists. He said that some
four to five thousand people have been using the name of the BLA as “an
excuse for anti-state activities” but lack the structure and planning of a
proper organisation. “These people are paid Rs 4,000 to Rs 5,000 monthly
by local and foreign elements to trouble the administration.” The
government also says it will move to oust MPA Balach Marri from the
provincial assembly because he is one of the leaders of the BLA.
All this is most intriguing. Why would the government declare the BLA a
terrorist organisation? This is what the interior secretary, Syed Kamal
Shah, told this newspaper: “Anyone associated with the BLA or supporting
its terrorist activities will be tried under the Anti-Terrorist Act.” This
is significant and it signals that the government may be planning a
crackdown in Balochistan in the near future. Mr Shah says that while no
senior BLA leader has been caught as yet, several small-level operatives
were in custody and they had confessed to planning and executing acts of
sabotage.
The decision also allows the government to seal all BLA offices and freeze
its bank accounts. This is again significant considering that the
provincial home minister does not even accept that any organisation by
this name exists, albeit he has admitted that some four to five thousand
people might be creating a law and order situation.
Could it be that these people are actually active supporters of the three
sardars who have fallen foul of Islamabad? This is where the issue of the
identity of the BLA becomes so important. Does such an organisation really
exist? Granted that “BLA spokesmen” have been all too keen to take
responsibility for various acts of sabotage; granted also that they send
press releases to the media and there have been reports in various
newspapers and magazines of armed Baloch posing as BLA members. Yet we do
need to know whether this is a real thing with a proper structure,
organisation, goals and objectives or whether this shadowy outfit is a
ragtag bunch of Baloch nationalists whose sole purpose is to be in the
employ of Baloch sardars and trouble the government on their behalf.
A possible giveaway could be the fact that the government can now seal the
offices of the BLA and freeze its bank accounts. What does this mean?
Surely, the BLA does not operate from known locations; neither is it
likely to have bank accounts, or at least accounts that can be discovered.
On the other hand, Baloch nationalist parties do have overt locations and
known accounts. What if the interior ministry or some intelligence agency
should find some dubious “connection” between a known nationalist party
and this shadowy BLA? Will it freeze the accounts of the party and seal
its offices? Is this a prelude to this sort of a crackdown in the province
in the near future?
Possibly. As a matter of fact Mr Shah told the media on Sunday that Balach
Marri, the son of Nawab Khair Baksh Marri — one of the rebel sardars —
heads the BLA. This means not only that Mr Marri can now be arrested and
tried under the ATA in his absence but that he stands to lose his seat in
the Balochistan Assembly. The move is, therefore, geared towards putting
the squeeze on the sardars who remain recalcitrant and who the government
thinks are goading the youth into acts of sabotage and subversion. The BLA
comes in handy because it is difficult to crack down on nationalist
parties with representation in the legislatures but it is easier to ban
them if they are found involved with the “BLA”.
This is not a smart move. It is not backed and supplemented by a political
process. The sub-committee headed by Senator Wasim Sajjad has still to
finalise and present its report on the power-sharing formula. It is all
very good to put down a couple of anti-government sardars and induct other
pro-government sardars into the province and do some development work —
all in tandem — in order to tame the province. But surely development and
participation is not about “taming” any province. It is about
participation in and profit from an equitable distribution of the fruits
of development. It is about removing the sense of deprivation and inequity
that envelops the province. Banning this or that will simply not do.
Remember how the NAP was banned by ZA Bhutto on the orders of the Supreme
Court of Pakistan in the mid-1970s as an “anti-Pakistan” party? Did it
stop the same nationalists of the NAP from banding together under the ANP?
Didn’t the ANP then go on to win seats in parliament? Indeed, didn’t the
subsequent military government of Zia Ul Haq actually give a certificate
of patriotism to the ANP and all the jailed nationalist “anti-Pakistan”
elements and release them from prison unconditionally and withdraw all the
cases against them?
This is a bureaucratic measure that will be used to repress the sentiments
of those — misguided or not — who want greater rights for their province.
It will not solve anything. A statement by Sheikh Rashid yesterday to the
effect that there will be no talks with Sardar Bugti and that the army
operation will “sort out” the trouble makers confirms this diagnosis.
Dailytimes.com 11.4.06 |
|
|
Editorials from Pakistani press: Ban on
BLA
The federal government has declared the Balochistan Liberation Army
(BLA) a terrorist organisation and banned it under Section 11(b) of the
Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997. The charge against the BLA is that it is
involved in anti-state activities. Lists of the BLA’s office bearers
would now be sent to all police stations for taking action against them,
although it is not known if the underground group has ever revealed
itself. Similarly, the quest to freeze the BLA’s bank accounts may not
prove fruitful, if at all any exist. Balochistan’s IG police has
delivered an extraordinary piece of legal advice, asserting that now
that the BLA had been officially declared a terrorist organisation, its
name could not appear in the media. The IG went on to accuse the MPA
from Kahan, Balach Marri, son of the tribe’s chief Khair Baksh Marri, of
being the alleged head of the BLA, a charge Balach had denied last month
to reporters, although he expressed sympathy with the BLA’s demands for
complete control of the Baloch over their natural resources. The IG said
Balach would now lose his seat in the provincial assembly. Balach’s
elder brother Gazin, who served as the province’s home minister in
1993-96, is said to have been arrested in Dubai, on money laundering
charges according to Chaudry Yaqub, but which is still not clear. This,
however, is sufficient proof for the IG that the BLA has been receiving
funds from abroad, although he did not specify from whom.
Not unexpectedly, Baloch nationalist politicians have reacted negatively
to the development, saying it would further alienate the people of the
province and create more mistrust and hatred towards the Centre.
Already, a strike against the siege of Attaullah Mengal and his son
Akhtar Mengal’s houses in Karachi proved all but total throughout the
province on Sunday, with the exception of Quetta. According to
Balochistan’s home minister, some 4,000 insurgents are pitted against
the government’s security forces. Official spokesmen continue to assert
that the whole trouble will be put down in a couple of months and the
writ of the state established.
It is possible to see where the government is going on the basis of its
statements and actions since several rockets were fired near Kohlu
during President General Pervez Musharraf’s visit last December. Since
then, the province has been wracked by daily acts of sabotage of
infrastructure and attacks on the security forces, followed by
counter-attacks and operations by the latter. Contrary to the
government’s assertions that only two or three districts are troubled
because of the instigation of two or three sardars, the fact cannot be
denied that the pattern of guerrilla attacks extends through the length
and breadth of the province. Far from being able to crush the insurgents
in two months, the government is facing an incremental increase in the
violence plaguing the province. On these trends at least, the
government’s claim sounds more like wishful thinking.
Washington does not seem to agree with Islamabad’s characterisation of
the Baloch insurgents as terrorists, if the statement of Assistant
Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Richard Boucher during his
recent visit is anything to go by. Nor can the context of nationalist
demands for provincial autonomy and control of the natural resources of
the province be ignored when analysing the situation. The government
seems blindly to be adhering to the notion that force will ‘sort out’
the problem. Time will tell, but already there are many in the country
who do not share the government’s perceptions and warn of bigger
troubles to come if a course of political negotiations is not chosen
instead of the present aggressiveness. Thepost.com.pk 11.4.06 |
|
|
BLA banning
The government's decision to proscribe the Balochistan Liberation Army
(BLA) under the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act will further
isolate the Baloch people who have taken up arms to claim what they
consider their due share in the country's natural and political
resources. The government says its decision is based on evidence that
the group has been involved in anti-state activities and targeting state
installations and security personnel.
However, the banning of the BLA will only deepen the rift between the
state and the Baloch tribesmen, shutting the doors for a negotiated
settlement of lingering issues. If it is expected that the BLA's
proscription will neutralise its activities, the government is sadly
mistaken as similar measures against many extremist groups in the past
never dissuaded them from carrying out their agenda. What such steps,
however, led to was a complete breakdown of any communication between
state agencies and these groups that would have been possible otherwise.
Although acts of violence and terrorism are reprehensible and must be
denounced for they cause human misery, they are generally carried out by
groups of people who are victims of persistent desolation, despondency
and dejection. Such an analogy can be drawn for Balochistan as well --
the country's largest province endowed with precious natural resources
but massively under-developed and marred by deep-rooted poverty. The
state-sardar administrative convenience has only worked against the
interests of the people, many of whom found it expedient to express
their voices under the BLA umbrella.
Undoubtedly, the BLA's engagement in terrorism, or so the government
says, has only hurt the cause it has been struggling for. At the same
time, its banning is perfectly under the available statutes. But this is
not the solution. The state should have engaged the BLA and other
disgruntled Baloch groups in talks to find a negotiated settlement to
the issues. Policy and legal measures that exclude, alienate and isolate
never lead to durable solutions. Such steps only take situations to a
point of no return.
The state must not repeat the mistakes it made in the seventies when it
lost its eastern wing as a result of its flawed policy choices that only
hardened the radicals and created a conducive environment for external
actors to intervene. Jang.com.pk/thenews 11.4.06 |
|
|
Banning BLA
THE increasing incidents of sabotage, attacks on FC posts and personnel
and killing of innocent citizens in Balochistan are highly condemnable.
In cases responsibility for the acts has been claimed in the name of
Balochistan Liberation Army. While on Sunday the Interior Ministry
banned the BLA as a terrorist group, there are lot of discrepancies
regarding how government circles view the outfit. According to the
notification from Islamabad the organization is headed by some tribal
leaders. IG Balochistan has been more specific, saying MPA Balach Mari
heads the organization. Home Minister Nausherwani on the other hand has
expressed doubts about BLA being a centralised organisation. The
Interior Secretary has announced that the offices of the BLA will be
closed down and its accounts frozen . He has also declared that those
associated with it will be tried in Anti-Terrorism Courts. Banning an
organization that does not seek the government permission to operate
hardly affect its activities. Terrorist outfits do not maintain offices
with addresses and telephone numbers duly recorded in telephone
directories, nor do they keep bank accounts under their own names. The
measures are more likely to be employed, as maintained by Senator
Sanaullah, to harass political opponents accused of being “associated”
with the outfit. What is being done to Kh Saad Rafique, to quote only
one example, underlines that Anti-Terrorism Courts are liable to be
misused against government critics. If this happens in Balochistan the
situation will worsen rather than improve.
According to Interior Secretary the BLA maintains “frari camps” to train
workers to carry out acts of sabotage. This again proves that the use of
force is not the best way to deal with the phenomenon. What has happened
is that instead of there being reduction in militant activities, acts of
sabotage and attacks on security forces have increased manifold while
the frari camps continue to operate. Originally confined to Kohlu, Dera
Bugti, and Quetta acts of violence are now taking place from one end of
Balochistan to another. On Saturday a military convoy was attacked near
Wadh, causing injuries to a number of troops including a brigadier. The
military operation has been counterproductive. Great Britain which is
much more organised and resourceful than Pakistan tried for decades but
failed to quell militancy in Ireland through force and after burning its
fingers had to resort to political negotiations to settle the dispute.
The Tamil insurgency which has gone on for quarter century is yet
another proof of the failure of military solutions for complex political
issues. There is little likelihood of results being any different in
Balochistan.
As President Musharraf has reiterated several times, militancy can be
reined in only by addressing its root causes. It was a good idea to set
up a Parliamentary Committee to resolve the grievances of Balochistan.
Had its recommendations been implemented, the situation would have
improved long ago. Before it further deteriorates, the government should
open talks with Baloch leaders, all of whom want the resolution of their
problems within the context of the federation. Nation.com.pk 11.4.06 |
|
|
|